SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
0891988709335794v1
0891988709335794v2
22/4/246    most recent
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bermejo-Pareja, F.
Right arrow Articles by Román, G.C.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bermejo-Pareja, F.
Right arrow Articles by Román, G.C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Consistency of Clinical Diagnosis of Dementia in NEDICES: A Population-Based Longitudinal Study in Spain

F. Bermejo-Pareja, MD, PhD

Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red sobre Enfermedades Neurodegenerativas (CIBERNED) Spain, Department of Neurology University Hospital "12 de Octubre," Madrid, Spain

J. Benito-León, MD, PhD

Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red sobre Enfermedades Neurodegenerativas (CIBERNED) Spain, jbenitol{at}meditex.es

S. Vega, MD, PhD

Arévalo Health Center, Arévalo, Avila, Spain

J. Olazarán, MD, PhD

Department of Neurology, University Hospital "Gregorio Marañón," Madrid, Spain

M. de Toledo, MD, PhD

Department of Neurology, Hospital "Severo Ochoa," Leganés, Madrid, Spain

J. Díaz-Guzmán, MD, PhD

Department of Neurology University Hospital "12 de Octubre," Madrid, Spain

F. Sánchez-Sánchez, PhD

Department of Neurology University Hospital "12 de Octubre," Madrid, Spain

J.M. Morales-González, MD, PhD

Department of Research, Ministry of Labor and Social Affairs, Madrid, Spain

R. Trincado, MA

Department of Neurology University Hospital "12 de Octubre," Madrid, Spain

A. Portera-Sánchez, MD, PhD

Department of Neurology University Hospital "12 de Octubre," Madrid, Spain

G.C. Román, MD

Department of Medicine/Neurology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas

Background: Few longitudinal studies have verified the clinical diagnosis of dementia based on clinical examinations. We evaluated the consistency of the clinical diagnosis of dementia over a period of 3 years of follow-up in a population-based, cohort study of older people in central Spain. Methods: Individuals (N = 5278) were evaluated at baseline (1994-1995) and at follow-up (1997-1998). The evaluation included a screening questionnaire for dementia and a neurological assessment. Results: Dementia screening consisted of a 37-item version of the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the Pfeffer Functional Activities Questionnaire (FAQ). Study neurologists investigated those participants who screened positively (N = 713) as well as 843 who had screened negatively to test the sensitivity of the screening instruments or because they had a positive screening for other chronic neurological diseases. We detected 295 patients among those who screened positive and 13 among those who screened negatively. Three years follow-up evaluation demonstrated 14 diagnostic errors at baseline (4.5%) leading to a final number of 306 patients with dementia. The corrected prevalence of dementia was 5.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.2-6.5). Conclusions: The diagnosis of dementia was highly accurate in this population-based, Spanish cohort study, and our prevalence figures agree with other European surveys. Given the high cost and difficulties of population rescreening and its relatively low yield, we conclude that a single 2-phase investigation (screening followed by clinical examination) provides accurate information for most population-based prevalence studies of dementia.

Key Words: dementia • epidemiology • prevalence • population-based studies

This version was published on December 1, 2009

Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology, Vol. 22, No. 4, 246-255 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/0891988709335794


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




Advertisement